Analysis of the difference of the legally relevant facts of the indicator facts

Abstract

Current jurisprudential positions have exposed a series of errors incurred within the new accusatory criminal system led by the Attorney General's Office, specifically in the construction of the Legally Relevant Facts, since it does not conform to the expected and indicated assumptions. by law and other rules of criminal procedure. These failures are directly related to effects on due process, in such a way that it is the responsibility of all levels of society and especially the judicial branch to deal with mistakes. That is why, through a general analysis of all the aspects that frame the criminal technique of the Legally Relevant Facts found in the Political Constitution of Colombia, in the jurisprudence and other laws, it was possible to identify such failures, their consequences, but also formulated a series of recommendations that are expected to serve to reduce the risk of the duration of rights and become a point of reference for similar investigations